Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig

168 A.D. 239, 153 N.Y.S. 549, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 1915·Published

Opinion

Scott, J.:

For the reasons stated in Southern Leasing Co. v. Ludwig (168 App. Div. 233), decided herewith, the order appealed from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for an injunction granted, to the extent indicated in the opinion in above-mentioned case.

McLaughlin, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ., concurred; Ingraham, P. J., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for injunction granted to extent indicated in opinion. Order to he settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott, J.:

For the reasons stated in Southern Leasing Co. v. Ludwig (168 App. Div. 233), decided herewith, the order appealed from will be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for an injunction granted, to the extent indicated in the opinion in above-mentioned case.

McLaughlin, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ., concurred; Ingraham, P. J., dissented.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant against the Mecca Realty Company and the O. J. Crude Company, and the motion for injunction granted to extent indicated in opinion. Order to he settled on notice.

Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig, 168 A.D. 239, 153 N.Y.S. 549, 1915 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

168 A.D. 239 (Publicity Leasing Co. v. Ludwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related