Home/Supreme Court/Public Utilities Commission of California v. United States

Public Utilities Commission of California v. United States

385 U.S. 816, 87 S. Ct. 35, 17 L. Ed. 2d 54, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2932
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 1966
DocketNo. 121
StatusPublished
Cited by57 cases

This text of 385 U.S. 816 (Public Utilities Commission of California v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Utilities Commission of California v. United States, 385 U.S. 816, 87 S. Ct. 35, 17 L. Ed. 2d 54, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2932 (1966).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 671, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1017 the People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("Papuc") Southern California Coalition on Battered Women Toward Utility Rate Normalization ("Turn") Consumer Federation of America Consumer Action the National Association of Social Workers ("Nasw") the California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Us West Communications MCI Telecommunications Corporation Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee ("Committee") at & T Corporation the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of Consumer Advocates (Nasuca), Ameritech Operating Companies Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Pacific Bell United States Telephone Association (Usta) Bellsouth Corporation Respondents-Intervenors. The People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Consumer Federation of America Southern California Coalition on Battered Women National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners ("Naruc") Toward Utility Rate Normalization ("Turn") California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund ("Fund") Consumer Action National Association of Social Workers ("Nasw") and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("Papuc") Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("Bellsouth") Southwestern Bell Telephone Company National Telephone Cooperative Association Gte California Incorporated (Hereinafter "Gtec") MCI Telecommunications Corporation the United States Telephone Association ("Usta") Us West Communications Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee Respondents-Intervenors. At & T Corporation, MCI Telecommunications Corporation Consumer Federation of America Consumer Action National Association of Social Workers California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund Southern California Coalition of Battered Women Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("Southwestern Bell") National Telephone Cooperative Association Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies ("Bell Atlantic") Ameritech Gte Service Corporation ("Gte") Respondents-Intervenors. Competitive Telecommunications Association Consumer Federation of America, California Alliance Against Domestic Violence & the Family Violence Prevention Fund Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America
75 F.3d 1350 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
People of State of California v. Federal Communications Commission
75 F.3d 1350 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Wabash Valley Power Ass'n v. Rural Electrification Administration
713 F. Supp. 1260 (S.D. Indiana, 1989)
United States v. Thomas Tripp
782 F.2d 38 (Sixth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Ronald Jarrett
705 F.2d 198 (Seventh Circuit, 1983)
Frank A. Vicaretti, Jr. v. Robert J. Henderson, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, and Lawrence T. Kurlander, Intervenor-Appellee
645 F.2d 100 (Second Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Jack Gordon, United States of America v. Joseph Daly
641 F.2d 1281 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
United States v. David T. Lewis
626 F.2d 940 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Vincent R. Perrin, Jr., David L. Levy and Duffy J. Lafont, Jr.
580 F.2d 730 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
462 F. Supp. 464 (M.D. Tennessee, 1978)
United States v. Bergdoll
412 F. Supp. 1308 (D. Delaware, 1976)
United States v. Paul Clyde Villano and Pauline Smaldone
529 F.2d 1046 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Gaudet v. Woodlake Development Co.
399 F. Supp. 1005 (E.D. Louisiana, 1975)
Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission v. Federal Communications Commission
513 F.2d 1142 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Tennessee Valley Authority
387 F. Supp. 498 (N.D. Alabama, 1974)
Walter v. United States
386 F. Supp. 309 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1974)
Sioux Valley Empire Electric Association, Inc. v. Butz
367 F. Supp. 686 (D. South Dakota, 1973)
In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31. State of California v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., Robert Morgan v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of Philadelphia v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., State of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City of New York v. Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc., City and County of Denver v. American Motors Corporation
481 F.2d 122 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
California v. Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n
481 F.2d 122 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
McCloud v. State
494 S.W.2d 888 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 816, 87 S. Ct. 35, 17 L. Ed. 2d 54, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-utilities-commission-of-california-v-united-states-scotus-1966.