Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer

105 A. 391, 87 N.J. Eq. 679, 2 Stock. 679, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 468
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 A. 391 (Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Service Railway Co. v. Frazer, 105 A. 391, 87 N.J. Eq. 679, 2 Stock. 679, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 468 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree' is affirmed, with costs. We agree with the vice-chancellor’s construction of the jiowers vested in the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners and his definition of the word “necessary.” We express no opinion on ihe question whether the covenants in the contract between the sewerage commissioners and the contractors can avail the complainant.

For affirmance—Garrison, ' Swayze, Tkenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoi-i, Black, White, I-Ieppenhbimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Application of Hackensack Water Co.
125 A.2d 281 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Lidgerwood Estates v. Public Service, C., Co.
167 A. 197 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 391, 87 N.J. Eq. 679, 2 Stock. 679, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-railway-co-v-frazer-nj-1917.