Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
103 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 715, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 N.J.L. 24 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should' be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisoil, White, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, JIeppeni-ieimer, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 103 A. 1054, 90 N.J.L. 715, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 418 (N.J. 1917).
103 A. 1054 (Public Service Railway Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.