Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Joyce

182 A.D.2d 535, 582 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6210
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 182 A.D.2d 535 (Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Joyce, 182 A.D.2d 535, 582 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered October 2, 1991, which granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the summons and complaint to name "George E. Joyce, Inc.” rather than "George E. Joyce” as the sole defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to amend the summons and complaint pursuant to CPLR 305 (c). Notwithstanding the fact that the individual named as defendant, whose corporation performed the work for plaintiff’s subrogor, had died long before the action was commenced, the corporation’s attorneys responded to the action in the individual’s name after service was made at the corporation’s place of business. The corporation was thus well aware of the action and that it was the party intended to be named. Moreover, plaintiff’s error in naming the individual as [536]*536the defendant was perpetuated by the very actions taken on behalf of the corporation. Due to such misrepresentations, however unintentional, the corporation may not assert that its principal’s death rendered the original service a nullity, and that a new action is barred by the Statute of Limitations. Since no prejudice was caused to the corporation, and indeed none is alleged other than the running of the Statute of Limitations, the court correctly permitted the amendment. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arbelaez v. Chun Kuei Wu
18 A.D.3d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Wishnick v. Bollinger Industries, Inc.
259 A.D.2d 350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Freda v. Board of Education
224 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Flannery v. General Motors Corp.
214 A.D.2d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Manocchio v. Wohlfeil
206 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 535, 582 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-mutual-insurance-v-joyce-nyappdiv-1992.