Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Duarte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Duarte

188 A.D.2d 351, 590 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 351 (Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Duarte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Duarte, 188 A.D.2d 351, 590 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered on or about July 13, 1992, which, in a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, denied the application as untimely and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s contention that its application for a stay of arbitration should be deemed timely because respondent’s demand for arbitration was defective in that it did not contain his correct address, was properly rejected by the IAS Court on the ground that the demand did include the address of respondent’s attorney (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Granelli], 37 AD2d 113). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.), entered on or about July 13, 1992, which, in a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, denied the application as untimely and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner’s contention that its application for a stay of arbitration should be deemed timely because respondent’s demand for arbitration was defective in that it did not contain his correct address, was properly rejected by the IAS Court on the ground that the demand did include the address of respondent’s attorney (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Granelli], 37 AD2d 113). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 351, 590 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-mutual-insurance-v-duarte-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack