Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Camp Raleigh, Inc.

233 A.D.2d 273, 650 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 26, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 273 (Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Camp Raleigh, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Service Mutual Insurance v. Camp Raleigh, Inc., 233 A.D.2d 273, 650 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeíf, J.), entered May 6, 1996, which declared that plaintiif Public Service Mutual Insurance Company has no duty to defend and indemnify defendant Camp Raleigh, Inc., under multi-peril or catastrophe umbrella insurance policies, with respect to an underlying personal injury action against defendants David Cooper and Avi Cooper, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly concluded that the sexual molestation allegations in the underlying action do not constitute an accidental "occurrence” under the subject insurance policies issued to defendant Camp Raleigh, Inc. As noted in Board of Educ. v Continental Ins. Co. (198 AD2d 816, 817), "[t]here is nothing accidental about the charges contained in the [underlying] complaint * * * [S]exual abuse * * * is intentional in nature.” Here, the inclusion of causes of action sounding in negligent training and supervision does not alter the fact that "the operative act[s] giving rise to any recovery [are] the [intentional sexual] assault[s]. While the insured’s negligence may have been a proximate cause of plaintiffs’] injuries, that only resolves its liability; it does not resolve the insured’s right to coverage based on the language of the contract between him and the insurer.” (Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. v Creative Hous., 88 NY2d 347, 352.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Desir v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
50 A.D.3d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
RJC Realty Holding Corp. v. Republic Franklin Insurance
303 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Chicago Insurance v. Borsody
165 F. Supp. 2d 592 (S.D. New York, 2001)
King v. Dallas Fire Insurance Co.
27 S.W.3d 117 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Shared-Interest Management, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
265 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Sweet Home Central School District v. Aetna Commercial Insurance
263 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Mattress Discounters of New York, Inc. v. United States Fire Insurance
251 A.D.2d 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Green Chimneys School for Little Folk v. National Union Fire Insurance
244 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 A.D.2d 273, 650 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-mutual-insurance-v-camp-raleigh-inc-nyappdiv-1996.