Public Service Electric & Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

16 F.3d 444, 305 U.S. App. D.C. 22, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8265
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 14, 1994·No. 93-1411·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss, the response thereto and the reply, and the motion for leave to file reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave to file reply be denied. The Clerk is directed to return the lodged document. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted. Because the electricity transmission agreement that was the subject of the challenged orders has been can-celled, this petition for review is moot. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission with instructions to vacate its orders, 63 FERC ¶ 61,200 (May 17,1993) and 62 FERC ¶ 61,014 (Jan. 13, 1993). See A.L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States, 368 U.S. 324, 329, 82 S.Ct. 337, 340, 7 L.Ed.2d 317 (1961).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Service Electric & Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 16 F.3d 444, 305 U.S. App. D.C. 22, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8265 (D.C. Cir. 1994).

16 F.3d 444 (Public Service Electric & Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A. L. Mechling Barge Lines, Inc. v. United States
368 U.S. 324 (Supreme Court, 1961)