Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedNovember 17, 2025
Docket25SC231
StatusPublished

This text of Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner (Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, (Colo. 2025).

Opinion

Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent
v.

Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross.
Respondent/Cross-Petitioner

No. 25SC231

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc

November 17, 2025


Court of Appeals Case No. 23CA1537

Petition and Cross-Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.

JUSTICE HART does not participate.

Whether, as a matter of first impression, the "felonious killing" exception to the Wrongful Death Act's cap on noneconomic damages, § 13-21-203(1)(a), C.R.S. (2024), by its plain language applies only to individuals and not corporations.

Whether, in determining the amount a plaintiff is entitled to recover in a wrongful death action, the court of appeals erred in, first, applying section 13-21-203(1)(a), C.R.S. (2024) to reduce the jury's award of noneconomic damages to the Wrongful Death Act's cap amount and then, second, applying the defendant's proportionate percentage of liability to further reduce the recovery.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Estate of Carol Ross, by and through its personal representatives Derek Ross and Tanya Weindler as heirs to Carol Ross. Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-service-company-of-colorado-dba-xcel-energy-colo-2025.