Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission

361 U.S. 195, 4 L. Ed. 2d 237, 80 S. Ct. 292, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 3
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 14, 1959·No. No. 459·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to substitute Humble Oil & Refining Company, a Delaware corporation, in the place of Humble Oil & Refining Company, a Texas corporation, as a party respondent, is granted. The motions of Public Service Electric and Gas Company and the Alabama League of Municipalities for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, are granted.

[197] The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cases are remanded to that court with directions to remand the cases to the Federal Power Commission for reconsideration and redetermination in the light of Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York, 360 U. S. 378.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission, 361 U.S. 195, 4 L. Ed. 2d 237, 80 S. Ct. 292, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 3 (1959).

361 U.S. 195 (Public Service Commission v. Federal Power Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
370 F.2d 181 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
370 F.2d 181 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Callery Properties, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission
335 F.2d 1004 (Fifth Circuit, 1964)
Public Serv. Comm'n of NY v. FPC
361 U.S. 195 (Supreme Court, 1959)