Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport v. Clark
147 A. 458, 105 N.J.L. 647, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 292
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kaliscii, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport v. Clark, 147 A. 458, 105 N.J.L. 647, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 292 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 458 (Public Service Co-Ordinated Transport v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Costley v. Kijakazi
D. Alaska, 2021
Kravis v. Hock
54 A.2d 778 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1947)
Jasion Ex Rel. Jasion v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co. of New York
172 A. 367 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)