Public Schools v. Walker

76 U.S. 603, 19 L. Ed. 650, 9 Wall. 603, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1003
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1870·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

now delivered' the opinion of the court.

No member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires a reargument, and the petition must, therefore, be denied.

The rule on this subject, long since established, was stated by Chief Justice Taney at the December Term, 1852, in these words:

“ No reargument will be granted in any case unless a member of the court who concurred in the judgment desires it, and when that is the case it will be ordered without waiting for the application of counsel.'’

The grounds of this rule were fully explained in that case, and need not be restated. *

Where the court does not on its own motion order a rehearing, it will be proper for counsel to submit without argument, as has been done in the present instance, a brief written or printed petition or suggestion of the point or points thought important. If upon such petition or suggestion any judge who concurred in the decision thinks proper to move for a rehearing the motion will be considered. If not so moved the rehearing will be denied as of course.

*

Brown v. Aspden, 14 Howard, 25; United States v. Knight’s Adm., 1 Black, 489.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Schools v. Walker, 76 U.S. 603, 19 L. Ed. 650, 9 Wall. 603, 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1003 (1870).

76 U.S. 603 (Public Schools v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bruce
52 F. Supp. 150 (W.D. Kentucky, 1943)
Gas Products Co. v. Rankin
207 P. 993 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)
The Vera
226 F. 369 (First Circuit, 1915)
Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Omaha
216 F. 848 (Eighth Circuit, 1914)
Murray v. United States
46 Ct. Cl. 94 (Court of Claims, 1911)
Smith v. Davis
187 F. 40 (First Circuit, 1910)
Wetmore v. Karrick
205 U.S. 141 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Lynchburg Cotton Mill Co. v. Travelers' Ins.
140 F. 718 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia, 1905)
City of Manning v. German Ins.
107 F. 52 (Eighth Circuit, 1901)
Pellett v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
105 F. 194 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington, 1900)
Brooks v. Raynolds
59 F. 923 (Sixth Circuit, 1893)
In re the Estate of Jessup
22 P. 742 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Roberts v. Haggart
29 N.W. 656 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1886)
Bronson v. Schulten
104 U.S. 410 (Supreme Court, 1882)
Giant Powder Co. v. California Vigorit Powder Co.
5 F. 197 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1880)
Brooks v. Railroad Co.
102 U.S. 107 (Supreme Court, 1880)
American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. Sheldon
1 F. 870 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1880)
Winchester v. Winchester
121 Mass. 127 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)