Public Schools of Wyandotte v. Harding

Michigan Supreme Court

Public Schools of Wyandotte v. Harding

125 N.W. 1024, 160 Mich. 185, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 741

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 1910

DocketDocket No. 40

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 125 N.W. 1024 (Public Schools of Wyandotte v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Schools of Wyandotte v. Harding, 125 N.W. 1024, 160 Mich. 185, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 741 (Mich. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Moore, J.

This case has been here before and is reported in 157 Mich. 86 (121 N. W. 296). A reference to the [186]*186opinion in that case will make a long statement here unnecessary. After the opinion was filed in this court an application was made to the court below for leave to amend the decree which had been affirmed by this court, by making it a decree dismissing the bill of complaint without prejudice. A motion was also made for leave to file a bill of review. Both motions were overruled and an appeal is taken therefrom. The appeal has no merit. A reference to the opinion in 157 Mich. 86 will show that the controversy was before the law side of the court, where all of the testimony was or might have been taken and the case was submitted to a jury and a judgment entered in that case. There ought to be a time when litigation shall end.

The final orders of the court below are affirmed, with costs.

Hooker, McAlvay, Brooke, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore, J.

This case has been here before and is reported in 157 Mich. 86 (121 N. W. 296). A reference to the [186]*186opinion in that case will make a long statement here unnecessary. After the opinion was filed in this court an application was made to the court below for leave to amend the decree which had been affirmed by this court, by making it a decree dismissing the bill of complaint without prejudice. A motion was also made for leave to file a bill of review. Both motions were overruled and an appeal is taken therefrom. The appeal has no merit. A reference to the opinion in 157 Mich. 86 will show that the controversy was before the law side of the court, where all of the testimony was or might have been taken and the case was submitted to a jury and a judgment entered in that case. There ought to be a time when litigation shall end.

The final orders of the court below are affirmed, with costs.

Hooker, McAlvay, Brooke, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 N.W. 1024, 160 Mich. 185, 1910 Mich. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-schools-of-wyandotte-v-harding-mich-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack