Public Realty Company, Inc. v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Florida

Public Realty Company, Inc. v. Cooper

21 So. 2d 142, 155 Fla. 650, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 606

DecidedMarch 2, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 21 So. 2d 142 (Public Realty Company, Inc. v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Realty Company, Inc. v. Cooper, 21 So. 2d 142, 155 Fla. 650, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 606 (Fla. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a final decree dismissing a bill of -complaint praying for specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. It appears that appellee listed the real .■estate -with one P. L. Watson who later secured a purchaser. ■The point in the controversy is whether or not the owner ratified such an agreement made by Watson as she can now be required to comply with. We- have carefully examined the record and the briefs and we think this question must be answered in the negative. The listing was not such as to relieve the owner of further dominion .over the land and we do not find that such ratification as she is alleged to have made amounted to this.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a final decree dismissing a bill of -complaint praying for specific performance of a contract to convey real estate. It appears that appellee listed the real .■estate -with one P. L. Watson who later secured a purchaser. ■The point in the controversy is whether or not the owner ratified such an agreement made by Watson as she can now be required to comply with. We- have carefully examined the record and the briefs and we think this question must be answered in the negative. The listing was not such as to relieve the owner of further dominion .over the land and we do not find that such ratification as she is alleged to have made amounted to this.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 So. 2d 142, 155 Fla. 650, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-realty-company-inc-v-cooper-fla-1945.