Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of Tucson
820 F.3d 1075, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7626, 2016 WL 1696226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of Tucson. Read the opinion of the Court — 836 F.3d 1019 →
Opinion
D.C. No. 4:15-cv-00138-CKJ.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge MURGUIA did not participate in the deliberations' or vote in this cáse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of Tucson, 820 F.3d 1075, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7626, 2016 WL 1696226 (9th Cir. 2016).
820 F.3d 1075 (Public Integrity Alliance, Inc. v. City of Tucson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.