Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts

489 U.S. 1006, 109 S. Ct. 1111, 103 L. Ed. 2d 175, 57 U.S.L.W. 3549, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 799

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts. Read the opinion of the Court — 492 U.S. 158 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 21, 1989·No. No. 88-389·Published

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 488 U. S. 907.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts, 489 U.S. 1006, 109 S. Ct. 1111, 103 L. Ed. 2d 175, 57 U.S.L.W. 3549, 1989 U.S. LEXIS 799 (1989).

Pincite

489 U.S. 1006 (Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.