Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Public Administrator v. San Diego

Public Administrator v. San Diego

268 A.D.2d 417, 701 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 196
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 417 (Public Administrator v. San Diego) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Administrator v. San Diego, 268 A.D.2d 417, 701 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which the Public Administrator, Kings County, was substituted as the plaintiff on behalf of the estate of Johnny Vigo, the defendant appeals, [418]*418as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated December 22, 1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, Tishman v City of New York, 30 AD2d 854, affd 25 NY2d 978). Bracken, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tishman v. City of New York
253 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Tishman v. City of New York
30 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 417, 701 N.Y.S.2d 633, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-administrator-v-san-diego-nyappdiv-2000.