Public Administrator v. Doyle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Public Administrator v. Doyle

240 A.D.2d 444, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D.2d 444 (Public Administrator v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Administrator v. Doyle, 240 A.D.2d 444, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, it is

Ordered that its unpublished decision and order dated May 5, 1997, in the above-entitled action is recalled and vacated, on the ground that Daniel Krasnick, the purported attorney for the appellant, did not have the authority to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the appellant; and it is further,

Ordered that Daniel Krasnick and counsel for the respective parties to the action are directed to show cause why an order should not be made and entered imposing such sanctions or costs, if any, on Daniel Krasnick pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) as this Court may deem appropriate, by filing an original and four copies of their respective affirmations or affidavits on that issue in the office of the clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before June 30, 1997. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, it is

Ordered that its unpublished decision and order dated May 5, 1997, in the above-entitled action is recalled and vacated, on the ground that Daniel Krasnick, the purported attorney for the appellant, did not have the authority to prosecute the appeal on behalf of the appellant; and it is further,

Ordered that Daniel Krasnick and counsel for the respective parties to the action are directed to show cause why an order should not be made and entered imposing such sanctions or costs, if any, on Daniel Krasnick pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) as this Court may deem appropriate, by filing an original and four copies of their respective affirmations or affidavits on that issue in the office of the clerk of this Court and serving one copy of the same on each other on or before June 30, 1997. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 444, 674 N.Y.S.2d 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-administrator-v-doyle-nyappdiv-1997.