Public Administrator v. City of New York

32 A.D.2d 627, 300 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3982
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order entered July 14, 1967, unanimously reversed on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion to enlarge petitioner-respondent’s time within which to file notice of claim against respondent-appellant City of New York denied. Special Term was without authority to grant the application under pertinent statutory provisions (General Municipal Law, § 50-e) nor, indeed, was any substantial reason advanced to excuse delay in filing. The claim for. pain and suffering avails not as a device for extending the time within which to file, arising as it did simultaneously with the claim for wrongful death (Joseph v. McVeigh, 285 App. [628] Div. 386, affd. 309 N. Y. 877). Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivem, Markewieh, McNally and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Administrator v. City of New York, 32 A.D.2d 627, 300 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 627 (Public Administrator v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hill v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
112 Misc. 2d 1008 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)