Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Bankers Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

91 Misc. 2d 118, 397 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2247
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 14, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment entered April 23, 1976 (Blyn, J.), dismissing the plaintiffs complaint after trial, is affirmed without costs. The trial court correctly concluded that in the absence of a written agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant bank, no obligation existed on the part of the defendant bank to pay the plaintiff a commission and the purported notice of lien, served by the plaintiff upon the defendant insurance companies, was without force and effect (Insurance Law, § 123, subd 3, par [b]). We, therefore, affirm on the opinion of Blyn, J., at Trial Term (83 Mise 2d 317).

Concur: Dudley, P. J., Hughes and Riccobono, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Bankers Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, 91 Misc. 2d 118, 397 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

91 Misc. 2d 118 (Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Bankers Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weg & Myers, P. C. v. Banesto Banking Corp.
175 A.D.2d 65 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Public Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Bankers Federal Savings & Loan Association
61 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)