Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Miss. v. Indymac MBS, Inc.
135 S. Ct. 41, 189 L. Ed. 2d 893, 83 U.S.L.W. 3145, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4891
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 23, 2014·No. No. 13–640.·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Parties are directed to file letter briefs addressing the following question: 'What *42should be the effect, if any, of the proposed settlement agreement now pending before the district court on the matter pending before this Court?' Briefs are limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before noon, Thursday, September 25, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Miss. v. Indymac MBS, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 41, 189 L. Ed. 2d 893, 83 U.S.L.W. 3145, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4891 (U.S. 2014).
135 S. Ct. 41 (Pub. Employees' Ret. Sys. of Miss. v. Indymac MBS, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
North Sound Capital LLC v. Merck & Co Inc
702 F. App'x 75 (Third Circuit, 2017)
Franklin U.S. Rising Dividends Fund v. American International Group, Inc.
605 F. App'x 32 (Second Circuit, 2015)