P.T.P., Inc. v. Casey
This text of 459 P.2d 770 (P.T.P., Inc. v. Casey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was commenced on May 11, 1962. On April 7, 1967, counsel stipulated that the time within which the action could be brought to trial was extended to November 11, 1967. The case was not brought on for trial by that date. On September 17, 1968, the district court granted defendants’ (respondents’) motion to dismiss. It is sought to reverse that ruling on the basis of a recently enacted statute, NRS 14.150, which [563]*563provides that a mandatory dismissal for failure to prosecute shall not occur until the lapse of seven years.
We have recently rejected that contention. Lindauer v. Allen, 85 Nev. 430, 456 P.2d 851 (1969); Volpert v. Papagna, 85 Nev. 437, 456 P.2d 848 (1969). And now once more we reaffirm those decisions and affirm the district court’s ruling in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 P.2d 770, 85 Nev. 562, 1969 Nev. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ptp-inc-v-casey-nev-1969.