P.T. v. The Rockefeller University

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 26, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-06740·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X : P.T.; J.A.T.; J.T.; and M.V., : : Plaintiffs, : _2_1_-CV-0_6_7_4_0_ (JMF) -v- : : CIVIL CASE THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY : MANAGEMENT PLAN : AND SCHEDULING DDeeffeennddaanntt(.s). : ORDER : ------------------------------------------------------------------------ X This Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order is submitted by the parties in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3). 4 1. All parties [consent ______ / do not consent ______] to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The parties are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. [If all parties consent, the remaining Paragraphs should not be completed. Instead, within three (3)days of submitting this Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, the parties shall submit to the Court a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/ files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf.] 4 2. The parties [have ______ / have not ______] conferred pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). 4 3. Settlement discussions [have ______ / have not ______] taken place. 4. [If applicable] Counsel have discussed an informal exchange of information in aid of early settlement and have agreed upon disclosure of the following information within ______________ days/weeks: _T_h_e_ p_a_r_t_ie_s_ h_a_v_e_ _al_r_e_ad_y_ _e_x_c_h_a_n_g_ed_ _d_o_c_u_m_e_n_t_s_ a_n_d_ _in_f_o_rm__a_ti_o_n_ i_n_ _co_n_n_e_c_t_io_n_ _w_i_th____ _o_n_g_o_in_g_ _s_e_tt_le_m__e_n_t _d_is_c_u_s_si_o_n_s_. _ T_h_e_y_ _d_o_ n_o_t_ a_n_t_ic_i_p_a_te_ _a_ n_e_e_d_ t_o_ e_x_c_h_a_n_g_e_ f_u_r_th_e_r____ _in_f_o_r_m_a_t_io_n_,_ b_u_t_ w__il_l _w_o_r_k_ _to_g_e_t_h_er_ _to_ _p_ro_v_i_d_e_ a_n_y_ _a_d_d_it_io_n_a_l_ i_n_fo_r_m__at_i_o_n_ n_e_c_e_s_sa_r_y___ _a_s_ t_h_ey_ _w_o_r_k_ _to_w__ar_d_ _a _r_e_so_l_u_ti_o_n_ o_f_ _th_i_s_ m__at_t_er_.________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 5. Amended pleadings may not be filed and additional parties may not be joined except with leave of the Court. Any motion to amend or to join additional parties shall be filed no later than _A_u_g_u_s_t_ 5_,_ 2_0_2_2________ . [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than thirty (30) days following the initial pretrial conference. Any motion to amend or to join additional parties filed after the deadline in this paragraph will be subject to the “good cause” standard in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) rather than the more lenient standards of Fed. R.Civ. P. 15 and 21.] 6. Initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) shall be completed no later than than _J_u_ly_ _2_1_, _2_0_2_2_________. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than fourteen (14)days following the initial pretrial conference.] 7. [If applicable] The plaintiff(s) shall provide HIPAA-compliant medical records release authorizations to the defendant(s) no later than _A_u_g_u_s_t_ 5_,_ 2_0_2_2_________________. 8. Discovery a. The parties are to conduct discovery in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York. b. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than _N_o_v_e_m__b_e_r _4_, _2_0_2_2_______. [A date not more than 120 days following the initial pretrial conference, unless the Court finds that the case presents unique complexities or other exceptional circumstances.] 4 c. The parties agree that there [is ______ / is no ______] need for expert discovery. If the parties agree that there is no need for expert discovery, all discovery shall be completed by the deadline for fact discovery, unless — prior to that date — a party files, and the Court grants, a letter-motion seeking an extension for purposes of taking expert discovery; any such motion should explain why expert discovery has become necessary and propose a schedule for such discovery. [If any party believes that there is a need for expert discovery, the parties should complete Paragraph 8(d).] d. [If applicable] All expert discovery, including reports, production of underlying documents, and depositions, shall be completed no later than _J_an_u_a_r_y_ _1_0_, _2_0_2_3_____. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than 45 days from the date in Paragraph 8(b) (i.e., the completion of all fact discovery). In the Court’s experience, expert discovery is rarely necessary in wage-and-hour cases, and it can generally be conducted concurrently with fact discovery (i.e., completed by the date set forth in Paragraph 8(b)) in cases involving claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act.] e. The parties should not anticipate extensions of the deadlines for fact discovery and expert discovery set forth in the foregoing Paragraphs. Relatedly, the parties should not make a unilateral decision to stay or halt discovery (on the basis of settlement negotiations or otherwise) in anticipation of an extension. If something unforeseen arises, a party may seek a limited extension of the foregoing deadlines by letter-motion filed on ECF. Any such motion must be filed before the relevant deadline and must explain why, despite the parties’ due diligence, discovery could not be completed by the relevant deadline. 9. Interim Discovery Deadlines a. Initial requests for production of documents shall be served by _A_u_g_u_s_t_ 8_,_ 2_0_2_2________. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than thirty (30) days following the initial pretrial conference.] b. Interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33.3(a) of the Local Civil Rules of the Southern District of New York shall be served by _A_u_g_u_s_t_ 8_,_ 2_0_2_2_________. [Absent exceptional circumstances, a date not more than thirty (30) days following the initial pretrial conference.] No Rule 33.3(a) interrogatories need to be served with respect to disclosures automatically required by Fed. R. Civ, P. 26(a). c. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, contention interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33.3(c) of the Local Civil Rules of the Southern District of New York must be served no later than thirty (30) days before the close of discovery. No other interrogatories are permitted except upon prior express permission of the Court. d. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, depositions of fact witnesses shall be completed by the date set forth in Paragraph 8(b). i. Absent an agreement between the parties or an order from the Court, depositions are not to be held until all parties have responded to initial requests for document production. ii. There is no priority in deposition by reason of a party’s status as a plaintiff or a defendant. iii. Absent an agreement between the parties or an order from the Court, non-party depositions shall follow initial party depositions. e. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, requests to admit shall be served by no later than thirty (30) days before the close of discovery. f. Any of the deadlines in Paragraphs 9(a) through 9(e) may be extended by the written consent of all parties without application to the Court, provided that all fact discove

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P.T. v. The Rockefeller University, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

P.T. v. The Rockefeller University (P.T. v. The Rockefeller University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
509 U.S. 579 (Supreme Court, 1993)