PT Rahajasa Media Internet v. Telecommunications and Informatics Financing Provider and Management Center, Directorate General of Post and Information Administration, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X PT RAHAJASA MEDIA INTERNET

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 4643 (VEC)

JUDGMENT Center for Provision and Management of Telecommunications and Informatics Financing, Directorate General of Post and Informatics, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia (“BP3TI”) formerly Office for Rural Telecommunications and Informatics, Directorate General of Posts and Telecommunications, Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia, aka, BAKTI KOMINFO, Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, and Republic of Indonesia,

Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------X

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 14, 2025, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. It is proper for a district court to deny leave to amend "when amendment would be futile." Stegemann v. United States, 132 F.4th 206, 210 (2d Cir. 2025) (citation omitted). Leave to amend would be futile, as the Court cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute between an Indonesian company and the Republic of Indonesia concerning commercial activity that took place in Indonesia. This action is, therefore, dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York July 14, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk