PT Rahajasa Media Internet v. Telecommunications and Informatics Financing Provider and Management Center, Directorate General of Post and Information Administration, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia
This text of PT Rahajasa Media Internet v. Telecommunications and Informatics Financing Provider and Management Center, Directorate General of Post and Information Administration, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia (PT Rahajasa Media Internet v. Telecommunications and Informatics Financing Provider and Management Center, Directorate General of Post and Information Administration, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X PT RAHAJASA MEDIA INTERNET
Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 4643 (VEC)
JUDGMENT Center for Provision and Management of Telecommunications and Informatics Financing, Directorate General of Post and Informatics, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia (“BP3TI”) formerly Office for Rural Telecommunications and Informatics, Directorate General of Posts and Telecommunications, Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia, aka, BAKTI KOMINFO, Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia, and Republic of Indonesia,
Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------X
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 14, 2025, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. It is proper for a district court to deny leave to amend "when amendment would be futile." Stegemann v. United States, 132 F.4th 206, 210 (2d Cir. 2025) (citation omitted). Leave to amend would be futile, as the Court cannot exercise subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute between an Indonesian company and the Republic of Indonesia concerning commercial activity that took place in Indonesia. This action is, therefore, dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York July 14, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court
BY: ER Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PT Rahajasa Media Internet v. Telecommunications and Informatics Financing Provider and Management Center, Directorate General of Post and Information Administration, Ministry of Communication and Information, Republic of Indonesia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pt-rahajasa-media-internet-v-telecommunications-and-informatics-financing-nysd-2025.