Pszczolkoski v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Connecticut Superior Court

Pszczolkoski v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 373

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 23, 1936

DocketFile No. 49612

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 373 (Pszczolkoski v. Metropolitan Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pszczolkoski v. Metropolitan Life Ins., 3 Conn. Super. Ct. 373 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

O'Sullivan, J., Section 62, Rules of Practice, provides that:

"Where the pleadings do not fully disclose the ground of claim or defense, and the adverse party desires an order for fuller and more particular statements, he shall make his motion in writing, stating briefly the grounds thereof and the particulars desired."

Assuming the motion in this case to be proper, it nevertheless fails to comply with the rule in that no grounds are set forth on which to predicate any order.

Accordingly the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Sullivan, J., Section 62, Rules of Practice, provides that:

"Where the pleadings do not fully disclose the ground of claim or defense, and the adverse party desires an order for fuller and more particular statements, he shall make his motion in writing, stating briefly the grounds thereof and the particulars desired."

Assuming the motion in this case to be proper, it nevertheless fails to comply with the rule in that no grounds are set forth on which to predicate any order.

Accordingly the motion is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Conn. Super. Ct. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pszczolkoski-v-metropolitan-life-ins-connsuperct-1936.