(PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLC
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 RONALD F. TRINCHITELLA, No. 2:15-cv-2365-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral 19 argument by the magistrate judge on March 13, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 On September 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 22 contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 23 filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 ....). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 14, 2020, are adopted in full. 5 2. Plaintiffs motion for default judgment against American Housing Income Trust., Inc. 6 || (ECF No. 59) is denied. 7 | DATED: October 13, 2020. 8
10 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLC ((PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.