(PS)Nguyen v. Yolo County District Attorney Office

Opinion

HUNG M NGUYEN, No. 2:21-cv-00239-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER

v. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Defendant.

Plaintiff Hung M. Nguyen (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 4.) On March 17, 2021, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 5), which have been considered by the Court. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: April 13, 2021 '0 /) iol Tooke

B Troy L. Nunley . } United States District Judge