PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.

498 F.3d 486
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 615 F.3d 412
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. 04-41243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Our court upheld application of the antitrust per se rule to Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.’s imposing a vertical minimum price-fixing agreement on its retailer, PSKS, Inc., doing business as Kay’s Kloset ... Kay’s Shoes. PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc., 171 Fed.Appx. 464 (5th Cir.2006). The Supreme Court reversed, holding “[v]ertical price restraints are to be judged according to the rule of reason” and “remanded for proceedings consistent with [its] opinion”. Leegin Creative Leather Prods., Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2705, 2725, 168 L.Ed.2d 623 (2007). Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to district court for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., 498 F.3d 486 (5th Cir. 2007).

498 F.3d 486 (PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related