(PS)Giddens v. Solano County

Opinion

RICHARD GIDDENS, No. 2:19-cv-0019-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOLANO COUNTY, et al., Defendants. On May 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 14, 2020, are ADOPTED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim as set forth in the court’s March 11, 2020 order. ECF No. 48; see ECF No. 47. DATED: September 30, 2020.