(PS)Elam v. CEPTS

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 20, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-01455·Unknown

Opinion

NATHANIEL ELAM, SR., No. 2:21-cv-01455-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER

v. CEPTS, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff proceeds in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On August 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Dated: September 20, 2021 ° /) a | lake Troy L. Nuhlep ] United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS)Elam v. CEPTS, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PS)Elam v. CEPTS ((PS)Elam v. CEPTS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)