Psaty v. Larkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Psaty v. Larkin

39 A.D.2d 933, 333 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 933 (Psaty v. Larkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Psaty v. Larkin, 39 A.D.2d 933, 333 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

These are two separate proceedings which were tried jointly. The first above-entitled proceeding was to validate petitions designating petitioner, Martin M. Psaty, as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for the public office of Assemblyman for the 30th Assembly District. The appeal in that proceeding is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 8, 1972, which, inter alia, granted the petition in the proceeding. The second above-entitled proceeding was to invalidate petitions designating respondent Martin M. Psaty as a candidate in the same Primary Election for the same public office. The appeal in this proceeding is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 8, 1972, which, inter alia, denied the application. Both judgments affirmed, without costs (Matter of Sullivan v. Power, 24 A D 2d 709, affd. 16 N Y 2d 854). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These are two separate proceedings which were tried jointly. The first above-entitled proceeding was to validate petitions designating petitioner, Martin M. Psaty, as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for the public office of Assemblyman for the 30th Assembly District. The appeal in that proceeding is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 8, 1972, which, inter alia, granted the petition in the proceeding. The second above-entitled proceeding was to invalidate petitions designating respondent Martin M. Psaty as a candidate in the same Primary Election for the same public office. The appeal in this proceeding is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 8, 1972, which, inter alia, denied the application. Both judgments affirmed, without costs (Matter of Sullivan v. Power, 24 A D 2d 709, affd. 16 N Y 2d 854). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 933, 333 N.Y.S.2d 996, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/psaty-v-larkin-nyappdiv-1972.