(PS)Alfaro Brittany v. The Studio @ Hotel Berry

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MICHELLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, Case No. 2:24-cv-3395-DJC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THE STUDIO @ HOTEL BERRY, 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 28, 2025, the Magistrate Judge 19 filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and 20 which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations 21 were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 24 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 25 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 26 district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper 28 1 | analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed January 28, 2025, are 4 | ADOPTED; 5 2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is DENIED; 6 | and 7 3. Plaintiff is given twenty-one from the date of this order to pay the filing fee of 8 | $405; and 9 4. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further 10 | pretrial proceedings. 11 13 | Dated: _March 28, 2025 “Daal J CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28