(PS)Alfaro Brittany v. Roanasios

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 6, 2019·No. 2:19-cv-02064·Unknown

Opinion

MICHALLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, No. 2:19-cv-2064-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 4) Defendant. On November 19, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: December 6, 2019 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS)Alfaro Brittany v. Roanasios, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

(PS)Alfaro Brittany v. Roanasios ((PS)Alfaro Brittany v. Roanasios) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)