Psaki v. Sigg
225 A.D. 807
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In view of the expenses incurred and to be incurred by defendants, they were entitled to be secured by the additional undertaking applied for. (See Ives v. Ellis, 35 Misc. 333; affd., 67 App. Div. 619; Balinsky v. Gross, 72 Misc. 7.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Seeger, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Psaki v. Sigg, 225 A.D. 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
225 A.D. 807 (Psaki v. Sigg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ives v. Ellis
35 Misc. 333 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
Balinsky v. Gross
72 Misc. 7 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)