Psak v. Kardash

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

09-APR-2026

08:41 AM

Dkt. 90 ODMR

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

JERRE PSAK, Petitioner-Appellee, v.

KEITH KARDASH, Respondent-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION

(CIVIL NO. 1DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented Respondent-

Appellant Keith Kardash's March 31, 2026 "Motion to Vacate Summary Disposition Order Dated March 31, 2026 for Being Premature and Motion to Consolidate this Case with Keith Kardash v. Jerre Psak, Case No. CAAP-24-00000315," which the court construes as a motion for consolidation and for reconsideration under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40, the papers in support, and the records in case numbers CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, it appears that Kardash fails to demonstrate a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in the March 31, 2026 summary disposition order.

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 9, 2026.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Presiding Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge