(PS) Zazai v. Graff Logistics LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 FAZAL REHMAN ZAZAI; SKYLAND No. 2:22-cv-01729 KJM DB PS LOGISTICS LLC, 12 Plaintiffs, v. 14 GRAFF LOGISTICS LLC, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On October 23, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and 23 recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and plaintiff has not filed any 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 26 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 27 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 28 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 1 | ....°). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 23, 2023 (ECF No. 7) are adopted in 5 | full; 6 2. Plaintiff's September 30, 2022 complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice; 7 || and 8 3. This action is closed. 9 || DATED: February 7, 2024. 10 1 eee CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28