(PS) Wilt v. Pfizer, Inc.

Opinion

MEGHAN WILT, No. 2:24-cv-02060 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. By order filed March 12, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and 28 days’ leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was informed that failure to file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal. (Id. at 5-6.) The 28-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint nor otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). | Dated: May 7, 2025 Cardy it | i } a a CAROLYN K DELANEY? UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 2/wilt2060.fta_fScrs