(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 16, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-00131·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 William J. Whitsitt, No. 2:20-cv-00131-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 City of Stockton, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The motion to reopen at ECF No. 20 is denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Delay v. 18 | Gordon, 475 F.3d 1039, 1043 (9th Cir. 2007); Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. 19 | Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir. 2001). The motion to reopen at ECF No. 17 and the Findings 20 | and Recommendations at ECF No. 18 remain pending. 22 DATED: August 16, 2021. / 23 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton ((PS) Whitsitt v. City of Stockton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delay v. Gordon
475 F.3d 1039 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)