(PS) Vigil v. Department of Child Support Services

Opinion

THEODORE J. VIGIL, Case No. 2:24-cv-02109-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER SERVICES, Defendant.

Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action without counsel. Accordingly, the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302. On April 4, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on April 16, 2025, and they were considered by the undersigned. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 3, 2025, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED without leave to amend for lack of jurisdiction; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Date: April 24, 2025

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE