(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 1, 2023·No. 2:21-cv-02176·Unknown

Opinion

JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER DOROTHY, et al., Defendant. On December 13, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. /// /// /// Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 13, 2022, are ADOPTED; 2. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. DATED: January 30, 2023 /) “ / eben

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy ((PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Dorothy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)