P.S. v. Department of Children & Families

68 So. 3d 421, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14155, 2011 WL 3903198
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 2011
DocketNo. 4D11-2058
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 So. 3d 421 (P.S. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
P.S. v. Department of Children & Families, 68 So. 3d 421, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14155, 2011 WL 3903198 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

P.S., the father, appeals the final judgment terminating his parental rights as to his three children, contending that the Department did not make reasonable good faith efforts to rehabilitate him and reunify him with his children. The father has not provided this court with a full transcript of the proceedings below. “In the absence of an adequate transcript on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be affirmed.” A.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 958 So.2d 606, 607 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citation omitted); see also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Affir-mance is required in the instant case, as the father seeks to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and does not allege any error that is apparent on the face of the final judgment.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JOSEPH CASTLEMAN v. JEANN SAGA BICALDO
248 So. 3d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 3d 421, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14155, 2011 WL 3903198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ps-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2011.