(PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security

E.D. California

(PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security

DecidedFebruary 3, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-01266

StatusUnknown

This text of (PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security ((PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WAYNE TALENT, No. 2:24-cv-01266-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT (ECF No. 21) SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On December 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 19 recommendations (ECF No. 21), which were served on the parties and which 20 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court 22 presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 23 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 24 novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 26 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 27 recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 //// 1 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2 2. The Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter 3 jurisdiction and failure to state a claim; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Dated: January 31, 2025 “Daal A CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID WAYNE TALENT, No. 2:24-cv-01266-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT (ECF No. 21) SERVICES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On December 4, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 19 recommendations (ECF No. 21), which were served on the parties and which 20 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 21 filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court 22 presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 23 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de 24 novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 26 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 27 recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 //// 1 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2 2. The Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter 3 jurisdiction and failure to state a claim; and 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | Dated: January 31, 2025 “Daal A CoO □□□□ Hon. Daniel alabretta 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PS) Talent v. Dept. of Homeland Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ps-talent-v-dept-of-homeland-security-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack