(PS) Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC
Opinion
PETER STROJNIK, SR., No. 2:19-cv-01587-MCE-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER CAPITOL REGENCY, LLC, et al., Defendants. On April 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 47), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). /// /// /// /// /// The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 47) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. Defendant Hyatt Corporation’s motion to require plaintiff to post a bond (ECF No. 40) is DENIED; 3. Defendants’ motion to declare plaintiff a vexatious litigant (ECF No. 41) is DENIED; 4. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED; 5. This action is DISMISSED without leave to amend and without prejudice, for lack of federal subject-matter jurisdiction; and 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Dated: June 4, 2021 Mates LEK rl AS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC ((PS) Strojnik v. Capitol Regency, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.