(PS) Storman v. CA Alta Regional Center

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael D. Storman, No. 2:21-cv-00380 KJM AC PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. Ca. Alta Regional Center, 1S Defendants. 16 17 The court is in receipt of plaintiffs’ notice of voluntary dismissal, ECF No. 6. See 18 | Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (“document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally 19 | construed’”) (citations omitted). Accordingly, the magistrate judge’s findings and 20 | recommendations, ECF No. 3, and plaintiffs request to proceed in formal pauperis, ECF No. 2, 21 | are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 | DATED: June 8, 2021. / 24 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE