(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 3, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00195·Unknown

Opinion

THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT LIZARRAGA’S MOTION FOR AN v. ORDER INSTRUCTING THE CLERK TO REDACT PROOF OF SERVICE A. ASMAN, et al., Defendants. Defendant Lizarraga moves for an order instructing the Clerk to redact his home address from the proof of service previously filed with the Court (ECF No. 13 at 2). After full consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendant’s motion. Defendant is a peace officer, and disclosure of his home addresses violates the public policy of confidentiality, and jeopardizes Defendant’s safety and security. Hackett v. Superior Court, 13 Cal.App.4th 96, 100 (1993); Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). Further, defendants’ counsel have represented that they contacted the plaintiffs who have no objection to this request. //// //// //// wOAIe 2 OU VEY EY EAINT NS INES MUO Bo PI eA ee

After full consideration, and good cause appearing, the Court grants Defendant Lizarraga’s motion (ECF No. 31). The Clerk is instructed to redact Defendant Lizarraga’s address from Docket No. 13 at page 2.

| Dated: June 3, 2020 es id Kt | i { p CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman ((PS) Schmitz v. Asman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related