PS Royal Services Group LP, GP Royal, LLC, Stephen F. Perkins, and S. Perkins Investment Properties, Inc. v. Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 12, 2018·No. 05-17-01139-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered September 12, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-01139-CV

PS ROYAL SERVICES GROUP LP, GP ROYAL, LLC, STEPHEN F. PERKINS, AND S. PERKINS INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, INC., Appellants

V.

SCOTT FISHER AND KRISTI FISHER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-01665-2014

ORDER On September 6, 2018, we granted appellants’ motion for extension of time to file reply

brief and ordered the brief received by the Court August 27, 2018, filed as of the date of the

order. That same day, appellees filed a response to the motion urging it be denied because the

brief exceeded the maximum 7500-word count allowed under the rules of appellate procedure.

See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(2)(C).

We construe the response as a motion to strike. As the certificate of compliance in the

brief itself recites the brief contains a total of 11,143 words, we GRANT the motion and

STRIKE the brief. Appellants may file a reply brief that complies with the rules no later than

September 24, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PS Royal Services Group LP, GP Royal, LLC, Stephen F. Perkins, and S. Perkins Investment Properties, Inc. v. Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

PS Royal Services Group LP, GP Royal, LLC, Stephen F. Perkins, and S. Perkins Investment Properties, Inc. v. Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher (PS Royal Services Group LP, GP Royal, LLC, Stephen F. Perkins, and S. Perkins Investment Properties, Inc. v. Scott Fisher and Kristi Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.