(PS) Reedy v. State of California

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN G. REEDY, No. 2:21-cv-00223-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 18, 2021, the magistrate judge filed an order and findings and 18 recommendations (ECF No. 10) which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that 19 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 14 days. No 20 objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See 21 Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of 22 law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th 23 Cir. 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards. Good cause appearing, the Court 25 concludes it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS 26 HEREBY ORDERED: 27 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10) are adopted in full; 28 /// 1 2. Defendant Governor Gavin Newsom, sued in his individual and official capacity, is 2 dismissed from this case as a defendant; and 3 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further pretrial 4 proceedings. 5 | Date: October 7, 2021 6 {i /) 7 “ Lo

9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28