(PS) Prasad v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 ROSHNI PRASAD, Case No. 2:22-cv-01505-WBS-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On March 11, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 21 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 22 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 23 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 24 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 25 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 26 the record and by the proper analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 11, 2024, are ADOPTED; 1 2. Plaintiffs motion to remand, ECF No. 24, is granted. 2 3. This case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State of California in and for 3 | the County of Sacramento; and 4 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a certified copy of this order to Superior Court 5 | of California in and for the County of Sacramento and to close the case. 6 | Dated: April 5, 2024 Jy td ak. Ld, KE 7 WILLIAMB.SHUBB □ 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28