(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 11, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-01720·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 NICOLE PEARSON, No. 2:20-cv-1720 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ICANOTES-EHR, et al., 15 Defendants, 16 17 Plaintiff Nicole Pearson is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 19 1, 2021, plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 20 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 13.) 21 Plaintiff also filed a request seeking an order sealing this action. (ECF No. 14.) 22 Plaintiff’s request, however, does not make the necessary showing to justify sealing this action. 23 See Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (party 24 seeking to seal judicial records normally bears the burden of overcoming strong presumption in 25 favor of public access by showing compelling reasons). Nonetheless, out of an abundance of 26 caution, the undersigned will order that this action be un-filed. 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiffs March 1, 2021 request to seal (ECF No. 14) is denied; 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to un-file and remove the complaint from the case; 4 3. Plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed this action; and 5 4. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 6 | Dated: March 10, 2021 4 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 | DLB:6 35 DB/orders/orders.pro se/pearson1720.unfile.ord 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR ((PS) Pearson v. Icanotes-EHR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)