(PS) Oliver v. Ramsey

Opinion

DARON MICHAEL OLIVER, No. 2:19-cv-01782-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL L. RAMSEY et al., Defendant. On December 23, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. That period having passed, plaintiff has not objected to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are adopted in full; 2. The action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: January 30, 2020.